European Higher Education Area (EHEA): policy developments and trends
Deadline for abstract submission ( October 30, 2025 ) Deadline for article submission ( February 15, 2026 )
Fifteen years after the launch of the European Higher Education Area (EHEA), the higher education sector in Europe is facing new challenges at regional and global level. Cross-cutting issues such as system design, recognition of qualifications and quality assurance remain central to international dialogue and national education and training agendas.
Policies and trends in academic freedom, the social impact of higher education, automatic recognition, micro-credentials and transnational education (TNE), together with new forms of teaching and learning, are evolving and being tested by all higher education institutions.
These elements, combined with digitalisation and artificial intelligence, pose new challenges and require innovative solutions in the field of academic education and research.
This call for papers invites original contributions that explore the historical, legal, ethical and socio-political dimensions and impacts of higher education linked to developments triggered by the EHEA, also bearing in mind the various critical voices referring but not limited to a bureaucratisation of procedures in education systems and/or a lack of involvement of the academic community in all its forms (scholars, students and administrative staff). We particularly welcome studies that examine the following aspects:
• One or more of the three pillars of the EHEA: qualification frameworks, recognition and quality assurance.
• The TNE sector and other forms of international collaboration.
• Historical and systemic aspects of the functioning and organisation of the EHEA.
• Digital transformation and artificial intelligence.
• Aspects related to fundamental principles in higher education, including academic freedom and institutional autonomy.
• Analysis of EHEA ministerial communiqués and the role and documentation produced by the Bologna Follow-up Group (BFUG).
• The role and participation of stakeholders in the EHEA.
• Global impact and openness to other regions of the world of the EHEA.
• The evolution of lifelong learning in the EHEA, including new developments on micro-credentials and Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL).
• The global impact of the EHEA and its dialogue with other regions of the world.
• The social impact of higher education, particularly in relation to equity, inclusion, civic engagement and democratic values.
• The role of the EHEA as an intergovernmental voluntary process in supporting international mobility of students and higher education institutions’ staff, and the internationalisation of Higher Education.
We welcome contributions from a multidisciplinary perspective, particularly in the fields of law, pedagogy, history, sociology and the philosophy of education.
Abstract Rules:
An abstract in Italian and English (max 1,500 characters).
Six keywords in Italian and English.
A short biography of the author, including:
Name and surname.
Research interests (not publication titles).
Any university or institution of affiliation, with the role held
Deadline for abstract submission ( October 30, 2025 )
Deadline for article submission ( February 16, 2026 )
The text must be sent to the Editorial Staff exclusively in Word format (doc or docx), to the e-mail address: redazione@rivistauniversitas.it.
Click on the buttons below to download the pdf of the editorial norms and the code of ethics:
Code of Ethics of the “Universitas” Journal
Preamble
Universitas. Rivista Online interdisciplinare adopts a peer review procedure based on the double-blind system to ensure impartial scientific evaluation. This system guarantees that reviewers do not know the identity of the authors and vice versa.
This Code of Ethics adheres to the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), promoting an ethical and transparent approach to academic publishing. All parties involved in the editorial process (Head Office, Editorial Board, Reviewers and Authors) are required to comply with the provisions herein.
The journal adopts an open access publishing model and is committed to ensuring scientific quality, transparency in academic debate and the integrity of research.
1. Duties of Authors
Originality and Plagiarism
Authors must submit original and unpublished works. The use of others’ work must be properly cited with full bibliographic references. Plagiarism and self-plagiarism are serious ethical violations and may result in referrals to authorities and sanctions.
Multiple Submissions
Simultaneous submission of the same manuscript to more than one journal or duplicate publication of substantially similar content in different journals is not allowed.
Authorship and Contributors
Only those who have significantly contributed to the research can be listed as authors. Other contributors must be explicitly acknowledged in the acknowledgments section.
Corresponding Author
The corresponding author must ensure correct attribution of all co-authors and obtain their approval of the final version of the article.
Funding and Conflicts of Interest
All sources of financial support must be disclosed. Authors must declare any conflicts of interest (financial or otherwise) that could influence the results or interpretation of the research.
Copyright and Permissions
Authors must ensure that the content does not infringe third-party rights. Any required permissions or releases must be obtained in advance.
Errors and Retractions
If an author identifies a significant error in their published article, they must promptly notify the Management to initiate appropriate corrections or retractions.
2. Duties of Reviewers (Peer Reviewers)
Qualification and Responsibility
Reviewers are selected among scholars with proven expertise in the relevant field. They must promptly notify the Editorial Board if unable to carry out the review in a timely manner or if lacking the required expertise.
Confidentiality
Manuscripts under review are confidential documents. They must not be shared or discussed without the explicit authorization of the Scientific Committee.
Objectivity
The review must be conducted objectively, avoiding personal judgments. Comments should be clear, reasoned and constructive.
Sources and References
Reviewers are expected to point out significant bibliographic omissions or substantial similarities with other published works.
Conflicts of Interest
Reviewers must refrain from evaluating manuscripts in case of conflicts of interest stemming from collaborations, competition or personal relationships with the authors.
3. Duties of the Editorial Board Coordinator
• Impartiality: the evaluation of submissions is based solely on scientific merit.
• Confidentiality: all manuscript-related information is handled confidentially.
• Integrity: unpublished material in the manuscripts may not be used for personal purposes without the author’s consent.
• Guaranteeing the peer review process: the Coordinator ensures that reviews are conducted correctly, anonymously, consistently and traceably.
4. Duties of the Scientific Committee
The Scientific Committee oversees the entire editorial process, ensuring adherence to scientific and ethical standards. In case of doubts about the ethical validity of the research or the submitted content, it may request clarifications and supporting documentation. It is responsible for implementing appropriate measures in case of Code violations, including suspension, retraction, or the publication of corrections.
5. Transparency and Scientific Debate
The journal promotes transparency in scientific debate by accepting responses or comments on previously published articles, in the form of notes or letters to the Editor. These contributions will be evaluated with equal scientific rigor.
6. Adherence to the ANVUR Code of Ethics
All members of the Scientific Committee and the Editorial Board commit to complying with the provisions of the ANVUR Code of Ethics, including rules on the declaration of conflicts of interest, participation in evaluation bodies and transparency of academic affiliations.